Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taste Over Internet Protocol
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Taste Over Internet Protocol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to me like a work in progress and perhaps not suitable for inclusion at this time. Since the idea was novel, it looks like it got a sudden burst of media coverage. But since then, nothing much seems to have happened. Google scholar yields only 1 result. (A newscientist article). In addition, the title of the article "Taste Over Internet Protocol", is something which seems to be derived from media reports, since IETF doesn't seem to have this (or any similarly named) protocol on record. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - the sources are real, but fail under WP:ROUTINE. TigraanClick here to contact me 14:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Stale now. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC).
- Delete I knew tasting the Internet was too good to be true. Then again, it probably tastes like dirty socks. WP:TOOSOON. There aren't enough good sources to show notability at this point. clpo13(talk) 00:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as not currently convincing of solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.