Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TasteKid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TasteKid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No ongoing notability to satisfy WP:N. Just one burst of press from within the last week. Suggest the article be recreated later iff notability is established. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 12:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first referred press coverage dates back from 2008 (just changed the "Retrieved" field to better reflect that). Coverage continued throughout 2009. Only a few mentions were selected. Void28 (talk) 13:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. One GHit that was a passing mention. No GBook/Scholar hits. One review on CNET. No other WP:RS found. (GregJackP (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Nuujinn (talk) 19:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.