Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Task Force: Ghost Team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Though someone already speedied it per G5. Sandstein 14:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Task Force: Ghost Team

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:GNG and it is full of WP:FANCRAFT. The article cites unreliable sources including the COD wiki and GameRant. IDK if this IGN Wiki is consider RS but I don't think so in my opinion but none the less still fails WP:SIGCOV Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not FANDOM, and the article fails WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think I forgot to write the message I can write in the article, I tried to find as many reliable sources as I could. NIRVAAN222222 (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It doesn't appear that the article title is even the correct name, so not a plausible redirect. ~ A412 ^talk! 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to do a different name which is the same thing. Task Force: Stalker can have mutiple names, like Ghosts or Ghost Team which all seem plausible. NIRVAAN222222 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Miminity, I think IGN Wiki can be considred an RS. It is more vague and public. It also reviews alot other real life games. With a large viewershsip, I think it's reliable. NIRVAAN222222 (talk) 21:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even so... there is no other Reliable sources to satisfy WP:SIGCOV. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 23:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CU Note I have blocked the article's author as a sock. The article would probably be eligible for deletion per G5, but we can probably allow this discussion to run its course. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.