Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tandemlaunch Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tandemlaunch Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of a series of linked articles on very marginally noted company. Article created by subsequently-banned sock-pupeteer active in creating articles on marginally notable technological companies. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam. Most refs are in very obscure web publications. Fails WP:COMPANY. Tijfo098 (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Refs 1,2,4, and 5 seem valid, though coverage focus is both Canadian and academic. Another possible ref [Here]. As a Quebec company, they may also ref in French, but my skills in French aren't up to the search. Celtechm (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC) This user is the subject of a current discussion at the conflict of interest noticeboard regarding paid editing[reply]
Delete not notable. Gigs (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and all guidelines for companies. Qworty (talk) 01:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.