Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talula's Table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator, no others in favor of deletion. Floquenbeam (talk) 02:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talula's Table

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable restaurant. Being "the hardest reservation to get in the US" and having multiple sources does not prove its notability. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 01:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, after seeing the sources that were later added into the article, I think they actually assert notability now. I withdraw this AFD, and since there were no delete votes, someone please close this AfD. Cheers, —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 22:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - satisfies WP:N with multiple (2) sources (including a 7 minute NPR piece) declaring it the hardest reservation to get, a notable restaurant title. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 02:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree that being "the hardest reservation to get" is a notable title, but let's wait for comments from others. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 02:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I miss the days of Jimbo writing the restaurant articles: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mzoli's_Meats :) Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 02:30, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], and [4]. Joe Chill (talk) 16:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.