Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tad Patzek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tad Patzek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications of notability; a rather ordinary professor. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Held two named chairs at University of Texas Austin, the Cockrell Family Regents Chair #11 and a leadership chair.[1]--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 19:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PROF#C3 (named chairs as above) and #C1 (highly cited publications as listed in Google scholar [2]). He's also a winner of the PNAS Cozzarelli Prize but I don't think that's significant enough for notability by itself. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep. And I'll add h-index = 21 from WoS, with most papers having small author lists and his name at or near the top. Subject conspicuously satisfies several criteria from WP:PROF. Please close this AfD so no more time is spent on it. Nominator shall please follow WP:BEFORE in the future – this case is not even borderline. Agricola44 (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.