Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TVS Wego

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TVS Wego

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be hardly anything but technical specs for a scooter. Doesn't seem to have any real content, and doesn't seem that notable. Math321 (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Almost entirety of the article is a copyright violation. It's the same data, presented in the same order, same format, as http://www.tvswego.com/techspec.html . Fixable, yes, but until and unless someone does fix it, it needs to be gone ASAP. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Withdraw delete; thanks Northamerica1000. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per significant coverage in reliable sources. The last two article titles are similar, but their content is different.

"TVS to ramp up Hosur plant production for 'Wego'". Business Standard. December 14, 2010. Retrieved February 22, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
"TVS Wego launched in Guntur". The Hindu. 2010. Retrieved February 22, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
"TVS Wego Scooter launched". The Himalayan Times. March 9, 2011. Retrieved February 22, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Copyright violation problem in the article has been resolved. Copied and pasted information removed. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Expanded the article by two more sentences. There are many sources and hence there is scope to expand the article further --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.