Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Systems visualization (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Systems_visualization

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The author of this article is using this page as a means to legitimize a "new" field for which there is not yet any reliable, published sources. What the author does here is synthesize a variety of sources in an attempt to produce original research. The academic papers linked from this article all discuss visualization, but none discuss "systems visualization" (with the exception of the Rivet project, which uses the phrasing "computer systems visualization" but in no way engages with the definition described in the article.") Many of the sources are simply listings for a course taught by Shiva Ayyadurai at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. A Google search of this professor shows that he has made other controversial claims about inventing technologies such as e-mail, and the only other sites I can locate on "systems visualization" seem to be operated by this professor. Ohiovis (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The term has no real meaning and appears to be WP:MADEUP. Definitely no evidence of sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Msnicki (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.