Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swindon Storm
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to BAFA National Leagues. Redirecting as the team is listed on the league page and !delete was not opposed. I am not opposed to the reversal of this redirect in the event that notability is achieved or other sources are found that establish notability. TheSandDoctor Talk 22:56, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Swindon Storm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is about a third-tier British American football team, so no clear notability. Coverage is limited to reporting in local press. Cordless Larry (talk) 04:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:12, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 17:12, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 09:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 09:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to BAFA National Leagues. No sign of meeting GNG, and I don't expect this to meet any SNG. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- delete only one source? almost no content. Redirect seems suitable too. Perhaps one day it will be notable, but it doesn't look that has achieved yet. No prejudice against re-creating article if notability is achieved (or other sources are provided to establish notability that I haven't found).--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.