Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suresh Murugan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete without prejudice towards a recreation based on independent, reliable sources if/when those are available. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Murugan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Probable autobiography. References sourcing facts about the topic all lead to unreliable sources. Contested PROD. Amalthea 22:58, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article: The sources are published and reliable in my opinion. Minima c (talk) 15:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's not really a matter of opinion. Can you point out the sources that are both reliable and cover the topic in detail, as asked for by WP:N? I don't see any. Artistsites.org certainly isn't reliable, but user-generated content as far as I can tell. And the other three sources don't mention the topic. Amalthea 19:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the current mess of a BLP. None of the sources are reliable - they are user-made or press releases. The text is so badly mangled as to require a complete rewrite. Based on my ultimate Google search, I doubt this can be sourced at all with English language sources. Every time I eliminated a false term, the number of Ghits went down dramatically. What was left was a bunch of directory listings, many obviously not this person. Otherwise, userfy and fix it. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while it is a good thing to try to counteract the pro-Western hemisphere bias in Wikipedia, the sources in the current article do not serve to show that the subject meets WP:ENTERTAINER. --bonadea contributions talk 10:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.