Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surel's Place (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Surel's Place (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. 10 pages of Google News hits did not turn one source from outside Boise. The prior AfD did not argue ORG, and there was a source from outside Boise mentioned. But, I believe it's irrelevant as it is bylined to an Idaho Statesman reporter and obviously a reprint. John from Idegon (talk) 03:23, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

– The above source demonstrates that the topic meets WP:AUD. The News & Observer is published in another state, in Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Comment - The "Shrinky Dink" story is the one I mentioned above. It's clearly reprinted out of the Statesman, and not really a discussion in detail of the subject. It's about 1 exhibition there. Still not seeing ORG. 07:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Stong Keep Surel's Place is notable as the only artist in residence program in Idaho. I don't get out there for every exhibition, obviously, but I'll keep an eye out and add to the gallery accordingly. That most of the references are local is neither here nor there. kencf0618 (talk) 21:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.