Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super OS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Super OS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable distribution; no third-party sources LucAndrea (talk) 20:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - There are plenty of third party sources on a link already in the article ( [1] ), including popular sites like lifehacker ( [2] ), softpedia ( [3] ), distrowatch ( [4] ), and many other less known sites... What information in the article would you like better sourced? maybe we can find more references for that? As a side note, there is also a mention in lifehacker of a tool included in the distro by the same developers (App Runner): [5]. While I agree this might not be as notable as distros like Ubuntu or Fedora, we have to face it that it is pretty hard for a recent (it seems to be at least from 2008, not sure if it is older...) open source project to get reviews/etc... Also note that this was "Super Ubuntu" in the past, so some coverage probably uses that name... -- SF007 (talk) 14:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- NOTE: I use this distro as my main OS, but I don't think that it conflict of interest... I also use others and I also edit their articles... SF007 (talk) 14:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as notable as any other distro. Note: I don't use it or any other version of Linux, but use of something is not a COI. If that was the case, 99% of all edits would be COI. It would only be a conflict if you were an author. RoyLeban (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I added a 3rd party source. Agree its basically as notable as many distros. Those refs above or others must go in. I tagged it as such. Widefox (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.