Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summers (EarthBound)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summers (EarthBound)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game location that is entirely sourced to Wikia and other fan-published Wikis. No sources that can WP:verify notability of this video game location, independent of the video game series itself. Article also violates WP:JUSTPLOT since there is no significant out-of-universe information to make this more than just a plot recap. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the most logical way to solve this dilemma would be to redirect this article into the main EarthBound article. GVnayR (talk) 02:55, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails the general notability guideline. Redirecting would be pointless because of the "(EarthBound)" part of the name. --Anthem 09:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Anthem of joy has been indef blocked as a sockpuppet of Claritas [1]. --Tothwolf (talk) 03:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The fictional town does not meet the general notability guideline and an article about it can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work. The material fails verifiability because it relies on unreliable sources. Due to the disambiguation in the article title, it is not a plausible search term, so a redirect is not needed. Jfgslo (talk) 16:14, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above; no evidence of real-world notability. J Milburn (talk) 10:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.