Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhir Vyas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhir Vyas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. there is no inherent notability in being an ambassador. even to/from a "major" country. almost all the coverage is not about him as a subject but him making comments on behalf of the Indian government. LibStar (talk) 03:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete trivial coverage. Fails GNG. No inherent or presumed notability for ambassadors. Jbh ^Talk 03:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Ambassador of one of the most populous countries in the world to one of the other most significant countries in the world. Yes, this is an opinion! People in this capacity are notable! -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no, there is no free pass being an ambassador from India. you are basically saying WP:ITSNOTABLE. consensus has shown this is clearly not the case. have you done an actual search for sources to demonstrate notability? let me guess, no. LibStar (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ambassadors are not default notable, we need sources which are lacking.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.