Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subtitle Composer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to KDE. ✗plicit 12:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subtitle Composer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPRODUCT. Current references are routine filles/multimedia failing WP:SIGCOV or non-independent sites, such as its own site and KDE Frameworks). Therefore, WP:NPRODUCT is failed, my WP:BEFORE found non-reliable, non-SIGCOV listicles, e.g., 1, 2, 3. This page was deprodded due to a ~~non-RS site with no editorial policies~~ an article from a site with editorial ethics but is mostly routine instructions on how to install and uninstall, hence non-SIGCOV. The existence of self-published user forums are insufficient, along with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. VickKiang (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Found references/articles:

- ubunlog.com website blog - editorial ethics page
- Latinoware 2022 demonstration
- youtube video review
- linux mint community community reviews
- that this project became part of KDE recently, its inclusion was proposed in 2019 and first version released under KDE umbrella was in 2020
- mentions in research papers/articles and books

Maxrd2 (talk) 10:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mentions, routine updates, and user/YouTube/WordPress reviews/demonstrations are obviously insufficient for WP:NPRODUCT. VickKiang (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to KDE - it's a fairly minor part of the KDE community output, there's very little independent RS that show it is notable. It is true, as above, that there are mentions in scholarly papers - but these appear to me to be just that. JMWt (talk) 11:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this. Merging over deletion should be preferred. Roost^T_C(please ping me when replying) 00:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea, as nom I also agree with a merge/redirect. VickKiang (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.