Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subject-object based metaphysics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Robert Pirsig. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant ^talk 14:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Subject-object based metaphysics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has had a notability tag for quite some time. It seems to be a term used only by Robert Pirsig, and the term doesn't appear to be vital to Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality D O N D E groovily Talk to me 07:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to section in Robert Pirsig. Doesn't have to be notable in itself to be in his article, as long is he is notable, and it is not UDUE in relation to his other work. PPdd (talk) 04:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect as per PPdd. What he said. =D --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.