Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupidedia (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stupidedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wiki-based website lacking any sort of notability. LiteralKa (talk) 01:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The arguments in the previous Afds strongly showed that notability exists even if the article is shoddy. Is there a new issue? Wickedjacob (talk) 03:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There's fairly obvious notability, even if the current article doesn't show it. I think that a translation from the German Wikipedia article is needed, but don't have the time at the moment (or, really, good enough German). PWilkinson (talk) 09:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have translated one sentence from the german wiki article, to make it clear what it differs from Uncyclopedia.[1] A google search with german only option gives 29.800 hits,[2] with english only results in 3.350 hits.[3] I'm not sure if this is enough for WP:WEB. On de.wiki the article has been deleted 12 times [4] and has survived 4 AfDs.[5] --Ben Ben (talk) 13:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appears to be notable, most references are just not in English. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- N/A 0 17:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, nom follows 2 prior keeps, without explanation for why prior consenus outcomes were wrong or need revisiting.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 03:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's supposed to be older than Encyclopedia Dramatica. 120.56.172.226 (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.