Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studia Humana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 15:56, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Studia Humana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, and promotional tone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the parent university article (after writing one :-). Otherwise delete. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge per Staszek. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no independent coverage of this magazine and no article to redirect or merge it to. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.