Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Baggs (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of The Apprentice candidates (UK)#Series Six. fomne redirect for the merge so anything sourced can be moved over Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC) He has appeared on several TV show since this and now presents TV in his own right. Surely valid for his own topic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petersneldon (talk • contribs) 19:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Baggs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person only famous for appearing in the 2010 The Apprentice show. An outline on Baggs already appears in the official Wikipedia list of candidates. This is written in a slanted form, and not NPOV. Myosotis Scorpioides 15:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet WP:BIO. Merge any useful additional content to List_of_The_Apprentice_candidates_(UK)#Series_Six. Mhiji 15:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Acather96 (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & Redirect: to List of The Apprentice candidates (UK)#Series Six. He is not notable enough for standalone article. Mattg82 (talk) 18:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & Redirect: to List of The Apprentice candidates (UK)#Series Six. He is not notable enough for his own article. He attracted a bit more attention than the other candidates at the time, but that died off pretty quickly once the series ended.--Korruski^Talk 16:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.