Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamophone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TravellingCari 03:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Streamophone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced article about a neologism. The alleged inventor of this word matches the username of the article creator. Violation of WP:MADEUP. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a neologism. JJL (talk) 01:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it's a neologism. RockManQ (talk) 01:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. A quick scan of the website that was mentioned doesn't reveal the author's name, else I'd have deleted the article as blatant promotion. It's sitting right on that cusp, though. Regardless, the article fails notability (a term used by one person) and verifiability (no independent sources). —C.Fred (talk) 01:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this neologism. Cliff smith talk 02:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism that is, according to Google, not used once outside Wikipedia [1]. Vaguely self-promotional as well. Also WP:MADEUP. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 10:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. And WP:SNOW btw. WikiScrubber (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.