Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalker (guide)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stalker (guide)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, notability has not been established. From what I can tell, concept already is covered in Roadside Picnic, information that isn't duplicate could be merged into that, or a relevant article if possible. SudoGhost™ 20:40, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 04:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Frankly from the content presented I'm not sure what this article is about. Whatever the topic is, it needs extensive second sourcing and clarification for subject matter.--User:Warrior777 (talk) 12:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article is trying to tie together in-universe material from several related works. Such a topic needs to be written from a real-world perspective (WP:WAF) and be based on secondary sources that address the topic in detail (WP:N). Marasmusine (talk) 12:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unreferenced article about a fictional guide that does not meet the general notability guideline and that can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work. Most of the content seems to rely on original research. Jfgslo (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: agree with above - remember to mark as patrolled, doesn't work automatically if you tag for deletion. Reichsfürst (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.