Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Closing over outstanding delete !vote per WP:IAR. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sputnikmusic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability or wp:web. The site's coverage in reliable sources is limited to brief quotes from reviewers.

The article deciphers between "professional" and "amateur" reviews, but there's no sign that there's editorial oversight with the professional reviews. It simply seems like self-published content Omarcheeseboro (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : I think its notable, just checked it at Alexa --Spada 2 ♪♫ (talk) 09:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Isn't there an essay that discusses how not to respond to AFD? I can't find it.--Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - None of the links and references are informational: as it stands this is mere advertising. SteveStrummer (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Alexa ratings ≠ notability. No secondary sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Weak keep didn't look close enough, a couple sources are fine. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:43, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see the problem - there are a few secondary sources in the article and over 1000 Wikipedia articles linking to the page. Anylayman (talk) 05:57, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - Since it is listed on Wikipedia:ALBUM/REVSIT. I apologize for not seeing that earlier. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 08:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.