Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springman Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Springman Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:CORP. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep record label is notable, has been there for years and carries bands from all around the U.S.A. Terveetkadet (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep large roster of notable artists including Andrew Jackson Jihad, Big D and the Kids Table, and The Phenomenauts. A culturally significant label, of the type WP:MUSIC refers to as "one of the more important indie labels". Chubbles (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Significant label from the 1990s second wave of American punk. Sufficient total releases to constitute inclusion-worthiness.,. A good source of in-links for band articles, may I add... Carrite (talk) 18:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Deply unsourced but (assuming it can be verif8ied) does seem to have a large number of notable artist on its list. But that is they key all this needs to be verified.Slatersteven (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron, with no explanation as to why this article should be rescued and how that could happen (per ARS instructions). SnottyWong ^confabulate 17:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A record company is notable if it has notable musicians signed to it. Dream Focus 21:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have gone ahead and added a number of references to the article. There is a lot more sourcing that needs to be done, but for now, I am entirely convinced of its notability due to the people and groups that it has signed. Silver seren^C 00:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems that some of the material is now sourced, they do publish some notable bands.Slatersteven (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep satisfied with the sourcing here. Certainly enough to WP:verify notability of the label during its time. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.