Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoonbender
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable artist that has been tagged as being of "questionable notability" since October 2006. I see nothing that hints at notability - the Spoonbender news site hasn't been updated since April 2006, and no major performances or releases have been listed. I've never nominated an article for deletion before, but I think the bottom line is that notability has to be proven and it hasn't been proven since the page was created nearly a year ago. Davemcarlson 02:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Abeg92contribs 02:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. That's odd. I wonder if this has any connection with I Am Spoonbender. It doesn't seem to, but this is strange timing. RookwoodDept. of Mysteries 03:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it does, but I actually found this page because I was looking for the I Am Spoonbender page and happened to type this in. I found the timing a bit strange too. But I guess that's for the Department of Mysteries to investigate :) Davemcarlson 07:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Haha, well-said sir! Cheers, RookwoodDept. of Mysteries 14:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it does, but I actually found this page because I was looking for the I Am Spoonbender page and happened to type this in. I found the timing a bit strange too. But I guess that's for the Department of Mysteries to investigate :) Davemcarlson 07:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing any sort of notability or reliable sourcing test. perhaps redirect after deletion to Uri Geller ? - Peripitus (Talk) 12:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A redirect should be to spoon bending, which is a broader topic than Geller. Gazpacho 20:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect after deletion to appropriate article on Psychics per Peripitus. RookwoodDept. of Mysteries 14:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. Mukadderat 16:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BAND, and do not redirect per WP:IDONTLIKEIT :) Jerry 21:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.