Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spongmonkeys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Joel Veitch. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spongmonkeys

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived advertising gimmick characters, no apparent notability. Article is sourced to a single opinion piece on Slate. No lasting notability for a puff piece on characters in an ad campaign. Scr★pIron^IV 14:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 14:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 14:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Joel Veitch. Curro2 (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as unlikely better notable and improvable from its current state and is likely best connected to him. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.