Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spike train

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Action potential. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spike train

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable topic that does not meet WP:GNG. Topic already is covered by action potential. Long term redirect to the "action potential" article recently disputed.[1] -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 14:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to action potential -Pontificalibus (talk) 17:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to action potential. Spike train is common terminology in neurology and thus definitely notable. However, there is absolutely no need to have this as a separate article. Redirect insofar warranted as I don't believe there is a different association for it than in the neural sciences. Nageh (talk) 19:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to action potential as well. No need for separate article.--NortyNort (Holla) 12:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.