Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider Rockets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After this closure, it was brought to my attention that User:JamesBurns and User:A-Kartoffel are abusive sockpuppets. I have therefore restored this article and relisted it. Stifle (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spider Rockets

fails WP:MUSIC, references include a single interview with the guitars (perhaps he's notable) but no reviews outside of all music (they cover everybody) and no indication of awards or charting singles/albums that would indicate notability. RadioFan (talk) 00:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage, no awards or charts, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, apart from the rated review at allmusic; [1], I could find nothing else that I would consider a reliable source, and nothing to back up the claim of touring overseas as stated in their bio. Just not quite enough to pass WP:Music at this time. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reliable coverage. A-Kartoffel (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your input. I have added several references to the band's charting success on the CMJ and FMQB charts, as well as references to their performance at the Popkomm Festival in Berlin, Germany. Percolating (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - In addition to the many new independent 3rd party references added by Percolating (good work by the way), I have also found 3rd party articles on the group Here, and Here. More to be found if you just look. Easily meets notability criteria. Unionsoap (talk) 23:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.