Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish Inquisition (3rd nomination)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Djikstra's algorithm. Did you expect this? (non-admin closure) 💜 melecie talk - 00:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Inquisition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a paradox. They say that nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition, but given that we know of the Spanish Inquisition and expect it because of this article, that can't be true anymore, right? Everyone expects the Spanish Inquisition, therefore the Spanish Inquisition should not exist. To allow us to not expect the Spanish Inquisition anymore, I believe it's for the best that this article be deleted. ^{[April Fools!]} 💜 melecie talk - 00:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Opinion because having an opinion on this matter would be expected. Planetberaure (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was expecting not to expect something, so it doesn't count. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, tis but a scratch. -I.R.B.A.T^{(yell at me) (The IRBAT Files)} 23:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.