Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sounds for Energy-efficient Buildings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds for Energy-efficient Buildings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

an EC project with no third party sources for notability. Those that are 3rd party, such as [1], seem just mentions of individual buildings where thetechnology was applied., or, like [2], do not even mention the project. DGG ( talk ) 18:42, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Fails WP:GNG & WP:ORG.--JayJasper (talk) 18:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator, pending evidence of (or development of) notability. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.