Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoundCloud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SoundCloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject had nothing but passing mentions on news articles. At its present state, the article has used primary sources excessively. Delete if it cannot be rewritten. Alexius08 (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete It has received a limited amount of coverage in independent sources, but nothing hugely significant. Aslo it has received an award, but as I've never heard of them before and we don't have an article on them I'm not sure how much significance to attach to it. Thryduulf (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam, award appears not significant, lacks non primary sources. Duffbeerforme (talk) 07:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.