Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar Alternatives and Associated Programmes
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Solar power in India. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 05:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Solar Alternatives and Associated Programmes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
promo, fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 12:39, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Once the blogspot and Indiamart sources were trimmed out, a couple of adequate sources remain. However the overall intent and raison d'etre of this article is promotion of any and all Jesuit Projects, per User:Jzsj's editing efforts wiki-wide. I have to wonder if GNG is met here, given the promotional effort. Yes, there are a few good sources, but on the other hand the article is the result of a concerted promotional effort that ignores RS and other basics. it's promotional, so I have to say Delete. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Merge with Solar power in India. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 20:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Merge with Solar power in India--Not enough coverage for standalone article but a good candidate to be covered in about two lines at the target.∯WBGconverse 07:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Merge with Solar power in India. Notable subject missing significant coverage. Kraose (talk) 07:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.