Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soder Cola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soder Cola

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't rise to more than a list of times a minor plot detail appeared in the background of the WP:PLOT. And the policy on what Wikipedia is WP:NOT says that articles need to include more than a list of plot details. All articles need significant coverage in reliable third party sources, as described by the general notability guideline. Even as is, it's a WP:TRIVIALMENTION in the fiction itself, let alone secondary sources, which prevents us from writing an encyclopedic article. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 03:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as minor plot detail. Pikavoom (talk) 07:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cleary fails NFICTION and GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:PLOT, Article does not provide clear information. Nika2020 (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.