Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sock puppet account

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was – This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser. . (non-admin closure) —GMX^{^(ping!)} 00:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet account

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, so block indefinitely.^{[April Fools!]} ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, send the nomination to SPI instead. Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 00:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technically indistinguishable from User:Example4. Both Blocked and tagged. Clerk assistance requested: please close by 00:00 on April 2nd, 2022. —GMX^{^(ping!)} 00:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Block away! Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of these are Confirmed to each other:
- PrincessPandaWiki (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- PorkchopGMX (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Scorpions13256 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 00:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can confirm. Blocked and tagged. Global lock(s) requested. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.^{[April Fools!]} Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 01:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk rejected close. Relisted. I re-ran the check on PorkchopGMX and can confirm he is Unrelated. —GMX^{^(ping!)} 01:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I re-ran the check for the socks and I got new one:
- Xingqiu Viator (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
*le cries*Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 01:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CU data was stale, PorkchopGMX (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) has been unblocked. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 01:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Im a shoe - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to User:PrincessPandaWiki, who has been blocked indefinitely on behavioral grounds. Blocked without tags per WP:DENY. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merging Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Example into this, see archive. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 03:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and block per WP:SOCK. Seems to be a WP:DUCK case. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 06:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sock1 (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep Sock2 (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep Sock3 (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Keep Sock4 (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.