Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SocialFire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SocialFire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTABILITY -- this is a WP:PROMO article for a website posted by the co-founder/CEO of site, with zero sources given for notability; "Socialfire" gets zero gnews hits. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination - it's nothing but a promotional puff piece. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am doing research on the site and later today, Ill work on a complete remake of the Article if you believe it is worth it. JohnArmold (talk) 14:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)— JohnArmold (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete: as per nomination. Single source, no sources found after a few searches to meet notability guidelines. --Pusillanimous 18:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet notability for corporations or web sites. In essence an advert for something that is only just going live - if it is ever successful and being discussed anywhere except by itself, then an article can be created. QU ^TalkQu 22:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no WP:RS, borderline spam. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I semi-protected the page due to repeated disruption by new users (i.e. socks of the page's author). --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - After searching, not finding coverage in reliable sources. It's a new website, and may be a case of WP:TOOSOON regarding inclusion in Wikipedia at this time. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.