Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoberCircle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TravellingCari 17:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SoberCircle

Unremarkable niche social network. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I posted this article in July to share with Wikipedia readers what many in recovery already know. This is the most legitimate recovery related website I have found. I have been a member there since May of 2008. Why is this just now being marked? I am a regular contributor on Wikipedia under a different username (used a different name here to protect my anonymity) gfp1968 (talk) 16:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a regular WP contributor, you should be aware that articles may be subject to deletion at any time if they fail to meet WP policies and guidelines (in this case, WP:NOTABILITY). You removed COI, advert, and self-referenced templates from Michael Cartwright which prompted me to look at your other edits involving Cartwright, and lead me to this article. I don't believe it is notable, but asserts notability as the "largest recovery community" so was not eligible for speedy delete. I hope that answers your question. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My contributions to the article Michael Cartwright was an effort to expand upon the entry SoberCircle. Deleting the templates was an error on my part, but I don't feel it demerits the relevance of SoberCircle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gfp1968 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions on other articles have no effect one way or the other on the notability of SoberCircle - I was just answering your question about why it is being nominated for deletion now. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete Not yet notable, only two news mentions for the site (rather than unrelated use of the two words.) [1] Sticky Parkin 21:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacking sources. -- Scarpy (talk) 04:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: 30k users for a recovery board on the Internet is pretty small. No indication that it has had an effect outside of itself or generated substantial note. Utgard Loki (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.