Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smith & Wesson Model CS45

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smith & Wesson Model CS45

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A contested Proposed deletion.

Initially "PROD"-ed with the rationale "This appears to be a small production run of a minor variant of the Smith & Wesson Model 457. The Smith & Wesson website has no mention of a "Chiefs Special" Smith & Wesson Model 45*.
Addition to picture caption "This is a separate model with a different frame from the Model 457"
From my WP:BEFORE research, if the "Smith & Wesson Model CS45" is not a variant of the Smith & Wesson Model 457, it would appear to be a non-notable S&W weapon variant perhaps modified or created by independent gunsmiths. Shirt58 (talk) 12:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DGG ( talk ) 04:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 01:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No secondary sources to show notability. The article consists of pictures of a gun with the photographer's descriptions. Borock (talk) 06:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The closest thing I can find to a source is an entry in a handgun database. I can't even find any information to show whether or not this is a variant of the Model 457, although I am not an expert in the field so I may not know the right places to look. Unless some reliable sources can be found, I think we have to delete this. Novusuna ^talk 19:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.