Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smartwheels (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge into Snow Crash and redirect there. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smartwheels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable technology from an otherwise notable novel. No sources cited. One external link talking about a similar technology that doesn't mention the book at all. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 05:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:V. Woodroar (talk) 05:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The consensus seems clear (there was a previous AfD discussion) that the parent subject is notable and that this aspect deserves note, but not as its own article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not receive significant coverage by reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as this is a likely name for a redirect. Diego (talk) 12:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & redirect to Snow Crash. No coverage in books or scholarly journals that I could find, and while I didn't spend a lot of time wading through a general web search, I only saw passing references in reliable sources (e.g. NY Times book review), and brief mentions in very marginally reliable sources (e.g. image-heavy website “magazines” that thrive on "top X whatever" articles as click-bait). ––Agyle (talk) 19:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Snow Crash, it's been awhile since I read Snow Crash, but from memory these are not a major plot point, just a nifty piece of scene-setting futuretech. I'm not sure there's anything worth merging, to be honest. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.