Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slurrup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. NPASR (non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 01:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Slurrup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined Prod. Per WP:Crystal. There are no independent reliable sources to support this unreleased album's notability. Of the four references currently in the article the first is an interview with the artist (primary source), the second only mentions its planned release in passing and the third doesn't mention it at all (those three are also blogs so their reliably may be questionable), the fourth is another interview (again primary source). • Sarahj2017 (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uncut magazine is a secondary, independent, and reliable source that is notable for being one of the largest active music magazines in the UK. Uncut magazine operates in print and digital form and is not an unreliable blog. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncut_%28magazine%29. The Uncut source does not cite an interview with the artist and is mentioned as an entry in the editor's personal blog from the magazine's main official website. The Uncut source also reviews a song from the album Slurrup, "One Way Out". The author of the article is the editor of Uncut Magazine.Minkthink (talk) 13:16, 17 September 2014 (CT)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.