Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slice of SciFi (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Slice of SciFi

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Slice of SciFi
• Articles for deletion/Slice of SciFi (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Slice of SciFi (3rd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Slice of SciFi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. None of the current sources are reliable secondary sources and finding reliable secondary sources is not possible using Google News as far as I can tell. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Won a couple of awards and some minor coverage, but doesn't seem significant as per WP:GNG. In any case, if kept, the article needs a significant trim of content. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Massively overblown article for a subject that appears to fail WP:GNG Dexxtrall (talk) 22:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.