Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slash'EM Extended

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Slash'EM. Don't usually close this early but seems the obvious outcome here. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:48, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Slash'EM Extended

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No citations to reliable sources, fails WP:N. RJaguar3 | u | t 04:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Slash'EM. Few hits in a Google search, and no hits in a WP:VG/RS search. Does not seem notable. It's a fork of Slash 'EM, so redirection there seems appropriate. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Slash'EM per NinjaRobotPirate. I also was unable to find secondary sources with a Google search. While it has an entry in the independent RogueBasin, this is a wiki anyone can edit, so it isn't a reliable source. --Mark viking (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.