Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slappy Squirrel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Animaniacs characters#Slappy Squirrel. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slappy Squirrel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like Chicken Boo, whose article was deleted last week, this Animaniacs character fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Neelix (talk) 13:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of secondary sources. Only appeared in a very small number of episodes... small fanbase, that's about it. (that and I never liked Animaniacs...) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Animaniacs characters where she is already mentioned. The collective list of Animaniacs should be independently notable and it would be the ideal place to put the info on Slappy. Them From Space 03:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Themfromspace. Recurring character that appeared in roughly one-third the series' 99 episodes, but not notable outside of the series itself. B.Wind (talk) 07:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Animaniacs characters. The lsit entry seems to already have all the needed information. I don;t really see anything worth merging. -- Whpq (talk) 17:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This article is nearly six years old. But, oh, the harm it has caused to wikipedia by existing is immeasurable, right? I care not a whit about Slappy Squirrel, but apparently people liked it for six years.--Milowent (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- It does no harm I don't feel is a valid argument, because the issue is does it have substantial sources to assert notability. I say Redirect to List of Animaniacs characters Dwanyewest (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.