Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvercrest SL65 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silvercrest SL65

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication given (or found on an online search) to show that this product is notable. As there is no Silvercrest article to redirect, deletion is the only alternative. The last AfD was in December 2006 and closed as no consensus. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have added mention of Silvercrest in the Lidl article and created a redirect to Lidl from Silvercrest. However, this product is not notable, and I think it unlikely that this is a likely search term - unless anyone thinks that all of Silvercrest's 35+ products need articles/redirects? -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 06:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:35, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Correct me if I'm wrong but this is just a Chinese radio decoder. Couldn't they write an article on Audionote Ongaku instead? East of Borschov 15:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as utterly lacking in notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: in the previous AfD, someone suggested rewriting and renaming the article to Silvercrest. In other words, they wanted to merge the article with a non-existing article. The non-existence of Silvercrest suggests there isn't enough verifiable information for an article, or that the subject lacks notability (or both). If someone can create a viable Silvercrest article, then we can talk about merging. Not before. --N Y Kevin @856, i.e. 19:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note I have contacted all the editors who were in involved in the previous AfD - with the exception of the closing admin and an IP editor - with the message "As you took part in the AfD in 2006, you might be interested in knowing that a new AfD has been opened. This message is being sent to all the editors who participated in that AfD, whether they supported deletion, opposed it, or had other options." -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as noted in the last AfD this could be redirected to the uber-parent company of Lidl. Otherwise, delete, as the article stands it is very non-notable. Skier Dude (talk 02:13, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As this article is about a particular product which is manufactured by Silvercrest, I think that this article should be deleted. However, I have added mention of Silvercrest to the Lidl article, and created redirects from Silvercrest. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 06:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.