Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Pi Oakland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PeaceNT 04:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Pi Oakland

Article of a part of a larger organization, in accordance with Wikipedia is not a directory. See WP:NOT Samwisep86 08:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is no notable information in this article that is specific to this particular chapter. --Explodicle 15:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to any Sigma Pi brothers voting here: You may want to rethink using Wikipedia as a tool for PR. If this stays up, there eventually may be a history section which would contain more than just the proud moments in your chapter's history. You should update the Fall Rush 2006 section of your website first. --Explodicle 15:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It makes no sense for every chapter of every fraternity to have their own entry. -- Otto 18:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nom, this is not necessary nor is it all that notable. Redirecting might not be a bad idea either if it deters the re-creation of this article. Burntsauce 21:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and all above--Victor falk 05:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Wikpedia rules, and as a personal favor to my brothers at the Beta Pi chapter. I'm not only worried about less favorable moments in history, but also the vandalism during rush weeks, from anybody who get kicked out of a party, anyone who gets denied a bid, etc. It could go unnoticed for a while before being reverted. I don't think you really want an article about you that can be edited by anybody on campus.Mdlutz 23:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.