Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shout-out
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Shout-out (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedurally nominated by me as this debate was a redlink in the deletion log. Original nominator RoySmith has been asked to come and provide the rationale for deletion Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure what went wrong, but thanks for fixing it. In any case, this is an unreferenced neologism, and has already been trans-wikied to wiktionary. Given that the wiktionary covers the topic well, there's no need for this entry in wikipedia. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.