Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelli Yoder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 14:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This went up for prod, but I wasn't sure if the winner of a state pageant was notable or not. Brought it here for discussion. Esprit15d( • ۞ • ▲) 14:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: As the PROD initiator, I vote for deletion on the grounds of non-notability. By the way: Is it appropriate for an editor, following the expiration of a PROD (which fact User:Esprit15d fails to mention), change the rules and create an AfD? The entire Wikipedia community had five days to remove the PROD and prove the article is notable. No one did. I do not appreciate User:Esprit15d's unprofessional and capricious actions. Maplewooddrive 16:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My actions aren't even remotely out of harmony with policy. To avoid future misinformed tirades, you need to familiarize yourself with the policy here (especially read under procedure for administrators, which is the relevant portion to this incident).--Esprit15d( • ۞ • ▲) 19:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if the article had already been deleted or Esprit15d were not an admin, there remains a perpetual right to request undeletion under the PROD policy. Stifle (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My actions aren't even remotely out of harmony with policy. To avoid future misinformed tirades, you need to familiarize yourself with the policy here (especially read under procedure for administrators, which is the relevant portion to this incident).--Esprit15d( • ۞ • ▲) 19:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Maplewooddrive, an admin should review a PROD, and it is entirely within policy to reject a prod and kick it to AFD for a wider discussion. Nobody is in the wrong here. --Dhartung | Talk 21:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Maplewooddrive. Stifle (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, below notability bar. --Dhartung | Talk 21:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if it is cleaned up.--Cartman005 02:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My apologies to and my fellow Wikipedians on this page for my strong language. I guess my frustration got the better of me. I should always assume good faith (as per WP:AGF).Maplewooddrive 00:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, even admins like me can make mistakes. All's forgiven. Happy editing!--Esprit15d( • ۞ • ▲) 12:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My apologies to and my fellow Wikipedians on this page for my strong language. I guess my frustration got the better of me. I should always assume good faith (as per WP:AGF).Maplewooddrive 00:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.