Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shafy Bello

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shafy Bello

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Article is an advert designed to promote the subject's career. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep, this is a joke. Nominator gives me plenty reason why I think he's a newbie. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sources currently referenced in the article shows that the subject has received significant mentions in local newspaper coverage. The subject passes criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR. Last but not least, the subject has been nominated for a major film award in their native country. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 22:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: The subject of the article passes WP:BASIC and WP:ENTERTAINER. It shouldn't have been nominated for deletion in the first instance. Eruditescholar (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no evidence of Notability Samat lib (talk) 19:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep The article subject passes WP:GNG since the subject has received significant coverage across numerous reliable sources. She has well crossed the threshold of notability. Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 07:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:The subject is obviously notable. She has been extensively discussed in reliable sources, some of which are even referenced in the article--Jamie Tubers (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A well written and properly referenced article such as this one deserves to remain on Wikipedia. Even if want to argue that she was only nominated for what is arguably a major film award, I see significant coverage in popular newspaper articles, so she already passes GNG.Darreg (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: adequate indicia of notability. Montanabw ^(talk) 03:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.