Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secure digital forensic imaging (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Secure digital forensic imaging (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Second AFD, incoherent mess. Cannot find any significant mention in scholarly work (or indeed anywhere much else). Most of the sources relate to digital media imaging which is an entirely different thing (this appears to relate to digital images of sexual assaults etc.) Errant [tmorton166] (chat!) 17:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems to be a kind of Forensic photography and should be (trimmed and) merged to that article. Jim.henderson (talk) 12:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the creator can add a bit to Forensic photography as noted above, if he has anything supported by sources. So far, nothing here appears to need to be merged. Dicklyon (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is no sourced information to merge. -- Whpq (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.