Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Search engine stats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Search engine stats

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of List in question, not sure if it is necessary or provable through the links provided. User who created this is trying to advertise for his search engine. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 16:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. According to the history page, the creator has been the only editor aside from two other editors. I agree that the page is clearly advertisement for a website. SwisterTwister (talk) 03:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:32, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is user:Rozbif's pet page.Curb Chain (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "Updates are done regularly!", this article is a blatant violation of several guidelines, including SOAP, FORUM, NOTBLOG. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 12:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.