Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Needham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy to User:Imnotafan/Sean Needham. The article may be moved back once notability is established with reliable sources. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Needham

Non-notable actor, if actor at all. No trace of him on google under the name "Sean William Needham" Passportguy (talk) 19:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Even the website for Buddy the Musical doesn't mention him under the role he claims to have played. Drawn Some (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete Sean Needham is an actor. This link provides proof of involvment with The Buddy Holly Story http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_-_The_Buddy_Holly_Story#Cast_list

Also his managements webite provides proof of his credits and more. http://www.cdm-ltd.com/client-cv.php?client=25 This is the link to his spotlight page where you can see clips of television appearances http://www.spotlight.com/interactive/cv/9095-7833-7542 The Wicked website is proof of his involvement with the Musical http://www.wickedthemusical.co.uk/readnews.asp?id=29wkd (Croxteth)

You can't use Wikipedia as a reference. That he is an actor doesn't make him a notable actor. There are specific criteria at WP:ENTERTAINER. Drawn Some (talk) 21:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Nonnotable actor. Iowateen (talk) 23:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"""KEEP""" An 'Extensive fan base' for an actor is relative to the current job they are in. Wicked has a world wide fan base for any actor that is involved with it. With his Uk tv appearances this makes him of interest. Below are more links confirming his involvement with Buddy - The Buddy Holly story

http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/buddy-rev.htm http://www.officiallondontheatre.co.uk/london_shows/show/item75343/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imnotafan (talk • contribs) 07:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy Non-notable? WIth a significant role in West End play and multiple soaps I doubt that's true. Give the author a chance to improve on the references. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Vote changed to keep: per Mac. Iowateen (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass the bar. He exists, all right, but is not notable. I've added a ref - review of the Buddy Holy Story - in which he is trivially mentioned. Article created by a single-purpose account. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.