Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screen Power

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Screen Power

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable publication. WuhWuzDat 16:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. Could find nothing about it on Google. The only "reference" given at the article is the magazine's own website, and when I clicked on it I got a warning that "this site may harm your computer." Kill it quick. --MelanieN (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on the basis of non-notablity. It seems that the magazine does actuallly exist, but nobody is qriting about it, quoting it or otherwise mentioning it, which means that it fails the basic criterion of having "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The only material available, it seems, is on the publisher's own website (once you get past the spam and pop-ups) and one fleeting reference to its editor (here).
Delete Wikipeterproject (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note this user simply added his signature at the top of the AfD, but as the edit summary was "Delete" I have moved it down here as a "delete" !vote. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.